Tax evasion and tax behaviour efficiency: a system dynamics approach
Abstract
Purpose and subject of researchTwo modifications of a system dynamics model are developed in order to study different types of a taxpayer’s behaviour – notably, opportunistic tax evasion and soft adaptive ones.Research methodologyA generic model by M. Allingham and A. Sandmo, based on “homo economicus” conception, implying that an agent is guided in his behaviour by maximization of expected utility, shows that taxpayer’s choice to evade taxes depends on tax rates and tax inspection parameters, among which the most important are the probability of inspection and penalty degree (penalty rates).Value results Computations have confirmed that with relatively low penalties and middle level of inspection opportunistic behaviour is more effective for taxpayers. When opportunistic motivation is mass-spread, this type of behaviour becomes predominant, which leads to substantial losses of the state. Such a state of tax environment is characterised by the conflict of interests of the parties: tax evasion is profitable for the agents and un-remunerative for the state.ConclusionsThe results of multiple experiments are discussed and comparative advantages and effectiveness of tax behaviour are analyzed regarding joint (declared + shadow) taxpayer’s income and real/net state revenue.Key words: entropy approach, income distribution, system dynamics model, inspection opportunistic behaviour.References
Allingham M., Sandmo O., 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, №1, pp. 323-338.
Andreoni J., Erard B., Feinstein J., 1998. Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, №2.
Chander P., Wilde L., 1998. A General Characterization of Optimal Income Tax Enforcement. Review of Economic Studies, № 65, pp. 165-189.
Chander P., Wilde L., 1992. Corruption in Tax Administration. Journal of Political Economy, № 49.
Hindriks J., Keen M., Muthoo A., 1999. Corruption, Extortion and Evasion. Journal of Public Economic, № 74, pp. 395-430.
Becker G., 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.76, №2.
Torgler B., 2002. Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, №16, pp.657-684.
Frey B.S., Torgler B., 2007. Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, pp.136-159.
Gachter S., Herrmann B., 2008. Reciprocity, Culture and Human Cooperation: Previous Insights and New Cross-Cultural Experiment. CeDEx Discussion Paper № 2008 – p.14.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tamara Merkulova, Tatyana Bitkova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved for authors with articles of printed version of ISJ "Economic Cybernetics" (ISSN 2077-8031).
Copyrights of published works are retained by the author(s) but with first publication rights granted to Donetsk National University. Further, in case of any plagiarism issue author(s) hold(s) complete liability.
Online version of ISJ "Economic Cybernetics" (ISSN 2312-5837) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ec.projects-manager.com.